It's been two months since a letter was dispatched to NOAA's public affairs chief inquiring about the agency's new and improved tsunami media-notification procedures, and still no response. This seems somewhat remarkable in light of the fact that NOAA's administrator was much speedier in his response to similar inquiries.
Nevertheless, I'm told by a NOAA public affairs spokesman that my letter hasn't simply been brushed off. "We've been extremely busy" is the explanation, and something may be coming out soon on NOAA's new procedures, which are long overdue.
This web log has said pretty much everything it needs to say about the need for new procedures. Visitors are invited to grind your way through the rationale, beginning with the first post in early January.
NOAA is invited to refresh its collective memory, too. It's all there -- especially details on the failure to have a Standard Operating Procedure in place to contact the mass media as a logical communication channel to a mass audience scattered around the Indian Ocean.
If the new and improved procedures don't include direct contact with the major international mass media, NOAA had better have a good explanation, because not only this writer but residents of the nations where thousands perished will want to hear it.
This web log was created one week after the December 26, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Media reports blamed the staggering death toll on the lack of a high-tech early-warning network similar to the Pacific Rim system. Missing was any mention of whether scientists called the media to sound an alarm once they suspected a tsunami had been generated. This blog will focus on the crisis response preparedness of U.S. agencies and their readiness for low-tech, fast-reaction response to future tsunamis.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Doug,
Thank you for your continued diligence in ensuring that this whole unfortunate incident does not get swept under a federal rug.
NOAA is "busy"? Perhaps that will be their excuse for their inaction from 1997 until the tragic tsunami of 26 December 2005.
Let's remember 2 things here:
1) Dr McCreery stated in 2003 that the PTWC had the capability to monitor activity and report on it to Indian Ocean nations. Additionally, it is NOAA and NWS policy that no confirmation of a tsunami ir required for submission of a warning.
2) The PTWC already establihed the new guidelines on what actions they would take on 28 March 2005 following the second great quake.
They threw out the book and responded, responded, responded.
So, how long can it take to get this down on paper?
Keep stoking that fire Doug!
Jeff Novak
VP Operations and Programs
World Disaster Alliance
Post a Comment